Re: Ignoring local changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Pazu wrote:

> 2006/12/14, Rogan Dawes <discard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > Why not remove it from the repo, then set .gitignore?
> > 
> > If it is generated code, or compiled code, it probably shouldn't be in
> > the repo in the first place . . . Simply correct that mistake, and you
> > are good to go.
> 
> Basically, because I don't want to mess with the upstream. I know, I
> can remove them only from my local branch, and never push the commit
> that removed the files, and that's what I'll probably do if there's no
> other way -- but it would be best if I could just ignore the files. It
> doesn't sound unreasonable, does it?

It is not unreasonable. But I could not find an easy way to do it with 
git. It should be easy to hack it into it, though.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]