Re: [PATCH 0/5] multithread traverse_commit_list (aka rev-list)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 08:39:26 am Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 
wrote:
> While this series does not break rev-list (but breaks all
> external commands, I don't care anyway), and it proves
> lock-free pack access works, it does not improve
> rev-list performance. I suspect extensive locking around
> "struct object *" may be the culprit.  

Or if it is memory contention and your threads share the 
same cache, it won't help much either,

-Martin

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. which is a 
member of Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]