Hi,
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> Geert Bosch <bosch@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Such special magic based on filenames is always a bad idea. Tomorrow
> > somebody
> > comes with .zip files (oh, and of course .ZIP), then it's .jpg's other
> > compressed content. In the end git will be doing lots of magic and
> > still perform
> > badly on unknown compressed content.
> >
> > There is a very simple way of detecting compressed files: just look
> > at the
> > size of the compressed blob and compare against the size of the
> > expanded blob.
> > If the compressed blob has a non-trivial size which is close to the
> > expanded
> > size, assume the file is not interesting as source or target for deltas.
> >
> > Example:
> > if (compressed_size > expanded_size / 4 * 3 + 1024) {
> > /* don't try to deltify if blob doesn't compress well */
> > return ...;
> > }
>
> And yet I get good delta compression on a number of ZIP formatted files
> which don't get good additional zlib compression (<3%). Doing the above
> would cause those packfiles to explode to about 10x their current size.
A pity. Geert's proposition sounded good to me.
However, there's got to be a way to cut short the search for a delta
base/deltification when a certain (maybe even configurable) amount of time
has been spent on it.
Ciao,
Dscho
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html