On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 02:12:22AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I think you need to start with something like: > > > > #!/bin/sh > > > > if ! type bash; then > > echo '1..0 # SKIP skipping bash tests, bash not available' > > exit 0 > > fi > > What about this instead? > > --- > #!/bin/sh > > if type bash >/dev/null 2>&1 > then > # execute inside bash > [ -z "$BASH" ] && exec bash $0 > else > echo '1..0 #SKIP skipping bash completion tests; bash not available' > exit 0 > fi > --- Yes, that's fine. It should be functionally equivalent to what I posted, but without having to invoke an extra bash when we are already running it (and avoiding the giant here-doc, though that is simply ugly and not a functional problem). One minor fix. I think it should be: exec bash $0 "$@" to pass arguments (e.g., "-v -i") to the bash sub-process. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html