Re: [RFC/PATCH] tests: add initial bash completion tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:28:39PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
>>> Something is better than nothing.
>>
>> Yes, but...
>
> ;-)
>
> This is a good example that sometimes something is worse than nothing,
> unless watched carefully by a competent reviewer.

And this is a good example of why you shouldn't blindly trust what a
'competent reviewer' says, as I'm pretty sure the comment is wrong.

But hey, if you prefer nothing, fine, drop this patch; let's continue
to blindly modify the completion and fix regressions as they come. I
guess I should drop my other tests as well.

I was planning to do a bit of reorganization to the bash completion
after having some basic tests, but I'll just jump straight away to the
actual patches then.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]