Re: [GSoC] Designing a faster index format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But even so: do we make any promises that (say) git-add is atomic in the
> sense that a reader always gets the before-update results or the
> after-update results?  Non-builtins (e.g. git add -p) may make small
> incremental updates to the index, so they wouldn't be atomic anyway.

Take git-checkout. I'm ok with it writing to worktree all old entries,
or all new ones, but please not a mix.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]