Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Maybe something like >> >> die(_( >> "You are pushing to remote '%s', which is not the upstream of your\n" >> "current branch '%s', without specifying a refspec.\n"), >> remote->name, branch->name); >> >> would be harder to misunderstand. > > Perhaps. Do we need to rephrase it without using the word 'refspec' > (e.g. "without telling me what to push"), or there is no point avoiding > jargon because other jargons (i.e. 'remote' and 'upstream') already appear > in the sentence? "without telling me what to push" sounds good. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html