Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> I do still think it would be nicer to pass the information out to the
> caller instead of just filtering.
Indeed.
> So combining the two patches, we have
> something like:
Hrm. I kind of liked the idea of doing this with a single plumbing call
to diff-files (the entries that come from --raw will be mostly discarded
except for the ones that are marked with "U"), though.
> diff --git a/git-add--interactive.perl b/git-add--interactive.perl
> index 2ee0908..0a83f56 100755
> --- a/git-add--interactive.perl
> +++ b/git-add--interactive.perl
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ sub get_empty_tree {
> # FILE_ADDDEL: is it add/delete between index and file?
>
> sub list_modified {
> - my ($only) = @_;
> + my ($only, $note_unmerged) = @_;
> my (%data, @return);
> my ($add, $del, $adddel, $file);
> my @tracked = ();
> @@ -370,6 +370,18 @@ sub list_modified {
> }
> }
>
> + if ($note_unmerged) {
> + for (run_cmd_pipe(qw(git ls-files -u --), @ARGV)) {
> + chomp $_;
> + if (/^[0-7]+ [0-9a-f]{40} [0-3] (.*)/) {
> + my $path = unquote_path($1);
> + if (exists($data{$path})) {
> + $data{$path}{UNMERGED} = 1;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> for (sort keys %data) {
> my $it = $data{$_};
>
> @@ -1211,10 +1223,14 @@ sub apply_patch_for_checkout_commit {
> }
>
> sub patch_update_cmd {
> - my @all_mods = list_modified($patch_mode_flavour{FILTER});
> + my @all_mods = list_modified($patch_mode_flavour{FILTER}, 'note-unmerged');
> my @mods = grep { !($_->{BINARY}) } @all_mods;
> my @them;
>
> + print colored $error_color, "ignoring unmerged: $_->{VALUE}\n"
> + for grep { $_->{UNMERGED} } @mods;
> + @mods = grep { !$_->{UNMERGED} } @mods;
> +
> if (!@mods) {
> if (@all_mods) {
> print STDERR "Only binary files changed.\n";
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html