Re: [PATCH] run-command: treat inaccessible directories as ENOENT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:21:29 +0200, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Frans Klaver <fransklaver@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

isn't it rather more sensible from a unit-test perspective to see
if start_command returns 127 instead of 128 in this specific case?


You are welcome to add another test that checks lower level implementation
detail, but this specific test is to make sure the gripe "Why does git
deny my aliases when I have inaccessible directory on my PATH?" will never
come back.

I think I didn't word carefully enough there. I didn't mean to dispute the use of the test. The test I proposed would make sense in t0061, but I would rather have expected the test in Jeff's patch in a tests that specifically targets aliases. It would be less surprising, wouldn't it? The fact that git goes through start_command before doing aliases is merely an implementation detail, from my point of view.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]