Holger Hellmuth <hellmuth@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> And you miss the most usefull (to me at least): "choose the version in >> the worktree". >> > > But the conflicted chunks are of the form "<<<< our ... |||||||||| > theirs >>>>>>" in your work tree. So there are two cases: > > a) You have removed the markers thereby removing the conflict -> this > means the chunk will not be offered to you as a conflicting chunk If you have removed the markers, then the file is still marked as conflicted in the index, and the user may still want to see the combined diff. My use-case is actually quite simple: I see "git add -p" both as a way to make partial commits, and as a way to manually validate what I'm about to commit. I review the diff, validate them with "y", and if I see something wrong, I quit "git add -p", fix the issue, and next "git add -p" won't show it again. This flow could work also with conflicts: $ git add -p # see an unresolved diff for file foo.txt n # see a resolved diff for file bar.txt y <-- the "missing" possibility for me $ edit foo.txt $ git add -p # see resolution for file foo.txt y $ git commit The "'git reset $path' before 'add -p'" workaround is not really handy there: it requires typing the path, while my workflow with "git add -p" does not, and it wouldn't show the combined diff, which is usually the best tool to see if a merge has been resolved properly. The current behavior is not that bad for me: I see the combined diff in the output, I just have one extra "git add $path" to type. Being able to just say "y" instead would be handy, but not fundamentally different. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html