Re: [PATCH] "master" should be treated no differently from any other branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> Wouldn't it be better to mention the id of the local repository too? 
> 
>   Merge branch 'master' of ssh+git://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond into 
>   'master' of 'hanwen@xxxxxxxxx'
> 
> this would give more information when these commit messages get pushed 
> to someone else.

And why not put your address and birthday in there, too?

Frankly, it does not matter. In my private git repository I see that I 
often merged from this machine to that machine, criss-crossing often. It 
does not buy me anything to even know _where_ I got it from.

Besides, the information you are most likely looking for is the committer, 
which is recorded anyway.

The single most useful information in the Merge message is the name of the 
branch I merged, since it is more often than not a topic branch, which is 
aptly named.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]