Hi, On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Johannes Schindelin escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Andy Parkins wrote: > > > >> "master" shouldn't get special treatment; making different log messages > >> based on the name of the branch is bad form. What if a user likes > >> "my/master" or "my/head" as their master branch? > > > > I do not agree. There is usually a principal branch, where you collect the > > topics, and you do want to treat that special. As for the name: better > > have a convention here than configurability. You would not want "git" to > > be called "guitar" for some users, just because they happen to like that > > name more, either, right? > > Disagree: I have two principal branches, master and stable/2.10. I > don't see why the latter should get different commit messages. Well, in your case I would even more strongly argue that "Merging into master" bears no more information than "Merging", since "master" is too generic a name. Since "stable/2.10" is more specific, the same reasoning does not apply here. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html