Re: odd behavior with git-rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Is there a way to differentiate a commit that is made empty as the result of a
>> previous patch in the rebase, and a commit that is simply empty?
>
> An empty commit has the same tree object as its parent commit.
>
>> I agree, I think perhaps adding an --allow-empty option to the rebase logic, so
>> that empty commits (or perhaps just initially empty, as opposed to commits made
>> empty) would be very beneficial.
>
> Yeah, that probably may make sense.


Can we have three behaviors?

A: Current mode, stop and error on empty commits
B: --keep-empty, to retain empty commits without further notice
C: --purge-empty, to remove empty commits without further notice

Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]