Re: Please discuss: what "git push" should do when you do not say what to push?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There is a proposal to change the default behaviour of 'git push' on the
> Git mailing list. The goal of this message is to encourage you to discuss
> it before it happens (or the change is aborted, depending on the outcome
> of the discussion).

+1 on changing the default to 'upstream'.

Having the same branch name on remote vs local repo shouldn't mean
they're necessarily the same branch (as what would be assumed with
'matching').  Also being explicit beforehand what remote branch the
local branch points to removes all doubt as it what 'git push' should
be doing for the owner of the local repo.

regards,
filipe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]