Re: Please discuss: what "git push" should do when you do not say what to push?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Sayers <andrew-git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 19/03/12 21:43, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> 
>> The same response applies. These administrators are taking responsibility
>> for their users by making them out of our reach.
>
> I'm not sure I follow.  It sounds like you're saying we should avoid
> helping anyone that doesn't stick to our upgrade schedule,...

I am not saying "should avoid".  I am saying it is not much use.

All we can do is to inform, educate and help those who are taking
responsibility, be it LTS distro or these administrators, to help their
users.  I've already outlined what LTS distros could do with backporting
and reverting in the previous message.

We can make sure that the "default flip" and "stop warn" patches can be
easily cherry-picked by them, even though we cannot force them to do so.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]