Christopher Tiwald <christiwald@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I prefer the "Some of your local..." language to "Updates were > rejected..." as a reader, but I think you're right about providing the > reason git rejected the push up front. Ok. > My concern about this particular message is "tip of your branch is behind > the remote" reads to me like my _current_ branch is the offender, when > that cannot be the case (it'd hit message_advice_pull_before_push > first). Maybe something like this might make it clearer? > > "Updates were rejected because a pushed branch tip is behind its remote > counterpart. If you did not intend to push that branch, you may want to > explicitly specify branches to push or set the 'push.default' configuration > variable to 'current' or 'upstream' to always push only the current branch." Sounds good. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html