On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Felipe Tanus <fotanus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> but if you know already other >> commands that might benefit from this parallelism, please tell me in >> order for me to include in my proposal. > > "git blame" (I think, I don't use this command much) and "git fsck". > "git index-pack" is getting multithread support soon (you can search > mail archive), but even then I think there's still room for further > improvements (i.e. parallelize the hashing code in the first phase of > checking the pack). > > If that's not enough, you may want to investigate whether multithread > support can speed up "git rev-list --objects --all" without adding too > much complexity. Speeding up this can also be achieved by implementing > pack format version 4 (current version is 3). But that's a bigger work > and may need more time to land. > -- > Duy Hi Duy, Thanks for the answer, was very helpful. I'll check this commands and see what can I complete in time to add into the proposal. Regards, -- Felipe de Oliveira Tanus E-mail: fotanus@xxxxxxxxx Site: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~fotanus/ ----- "All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us." - Gandalf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html