Re: svn versus git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andy Parkins <andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ...  The output of git-ls-tree is not user friendly; it
> requires some understanding of git internals.

ls-tree is not Porcelain and has right to expose the internals
by default.  "git ls-tree --name-only" could be aliased to give
"git ls" if you wanted to, but I wonder how often you would want
to run:

	svn list -r538

and for what purpose?

I often find myself doing

	git diff -r --name-status v1.3.0 HEAD

to check if a file was already in v1.3.0 version, and I could do
the same thing with

	git list v1.3.0 >/var/tmp/1
        git list HEAD >/var/tmp/2
        diff -u /var/tmp/[12]

but that certainly is awkward.

What do people use "svn list -r538" for and how often?  In other
words, when does it become necessary to get the full list of
paths in an arbitrary revision?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]