Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder <at> gmail.com> writes: > > Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > A'propos, there is git-archimport script, last modified (as an > > individual script) in 2007. Is anyone using GNU arch nowadays; > > isn't arch-fast-export better solution anyway? > > According to [1] (see the green line), it still has some users, > or at least people who access the file now and then. As long > as the script works, why would we want to cause them trouble? > > For comparison, here's the corresponding graph for people using > GNU arch[2] and participating in the same survey. > > Hope that helps, > Jonathan > > [1] http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=git-arch > http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=git-core > [2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=tla > http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=tla > Hi, please do not remove the ability to convert arch/tla repos unless it is a real cost to maintain the scripts. There may be few people who still use arch, but there may be a lot of them who have arch repos of quiescent stuff that one day they may need to revitalize. Sergio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html