Re: [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Just to be clear: I'm not saying that your workflow is wrong, but my
> feeling is that you wouldn't be hurt by 'push.default=upstream'. The
> area of potential improvement for your case would be at branch creation
> time more than at push time.

Your analysis of Stefan's pain points sounds very sensible.
The autoSetupMerge mechanism may want to learn new tricks, but that
is a separate issue and it shouldn't affect the search for a sane
default for push.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]