On 12-03-10 01:16 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote: > > I propose that the default should be even stricter: like "current", it > would push to an branch with the same name as the current local branch, > *but only if that branch already exists on the remote*. It would only > be possible to create a new branch on the remote by calling "git push" > with an explicit branch argument. I believe that such a policy would do > the right thing in the cases where the "right thing" is pretty > unambiguous, and would require a user decision in other cases. I haven't thought it through very deeply, but at first glance this seems like reasonable default behaviour to me. M. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html