Re: Trouble with file specific merge strategies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09:57, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> ... So when I came across
>> the possibility of using .gitattributes for file specific merge
>> strategies, I tried the following:
>>
>> pattern merge=ours
>
> I do not think we say .gitattributes can give merge strategy
> anywhere in our document.
>
> You can choose one of the few built-in merge drivers but "ours" is
> not one of them.  Have you defined your own merge driver "ours"
> following the example in the gitattributes documentation (look for
> "feel-free merge driver")?

Ah, that explains it. You are absolutely correct in saying that the
docs don't imply this. I was having doubts about this while reading the
docs (man gitattributes). I got confused by this[1] example on progit
and several pointers to it on stackoverflow. And no, I don't have a
custom merge driver.

This brings up the question, is that discussion on progit talking about
something else? Is there a way to setup file specific merge strategies
in a repo?

Thanks a lot for your response. :)

Cheers,

Footnotes:

[1] http://progit.org/book/ch7-2.html#merge_strategies

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]