Re: git push default behaviour?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> And regardless of the danger, if I look around me, I see almost only
>> people working with shared archives, and a few projects (including Git,
>> obviously) using the "one commiter per repository" workflow (I teach Git
>
> These days, you do not have to even go to kernel.org to find people
> and projects that use "publish to be pulled" model.  I hear that
> there is a popular site called GitHub where people create their own
> fork, publish their work there and ask the project they forked from
> to pull their work.

Github also offer a paid service where you can host private
repositories, which you're probably going to work on as part of a team
in a business.  FWIW, I discovered the problem with this default
behaviour because someone accidentally did a 'git push --force' to our
github repo.  There is currently no hook mechanism with github that
allows you to abort a push, either, so you can't stop the problem that
way.

Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]