Re: git push default behaviour?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> This is all sounding eerily familiar. Indeed:
>
>   $ git log --oneline -Swarn_unconfigured_push -- builtin-push.c
>   bba0fd2 push: do not give big warning when no preference is configured
>   665d3e8 Display warning for default git push with no push.default config
>
> I don't remember the mailing list conversations that surrounded those
> patches, but if we are going to have the same conversation again, maybe
> it is worth looking them up.

I just dug it up; start from here:

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/123350/focus=123541

read on a few messages downthread, and then jump to the other thread
Nana points at in the above message.

In short, we started warning that we _might_ change the default
someday, without having a clear concensus or plan, that ended up
confusing and annoying users without giving them anything good,
other than awareness that such a feature is _available_.

So no, the conversation did not decide if changing the default was
warranted or not. It just confirmed that we weren't anywhere close
to deciding back then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]