Re: Why Is There No Bug Tracker And Why Are Patches Sent Instead Of Pull Requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Ardill <andrew.ardill@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 1 March 2012 11:37, Greg Troxel <gdt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Do people really think it's reasonable to use non-Free tools to develop
>> git? That seems surprising to me.
>
> Maybe not, and if that is the case I am more than happy to let this die.

I won't speculate how big or small part of the Git community you would be
repelling by using a closed/commertial offering. It may not be such a big
deal, or it may be. I simply do not know.

But we will never find out until we try. The same thing can be said for
the usefulness of having a bug tracker and feasibility of keeping it
reasonably clean and useful over time with volunteer effort.  I commend
you for finally stepping up and biting the bullet to start an experiment.

One request I may have is to give read/browse-only access to unregistered
users without any account (I hate having to maintain credentials to random
websites, and I imagine so do many other people), but I am not the target
audience, so please do not bend backwards to implement such if it is too
much trouble with the system.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]