René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Now that options whose definition starts with "no-" can be negated > by removing said "no-", there is no need anymore to allow them to > be negated by adding a second "no-", which just looks silly. Thanks. But accepting them silently and do what the user would have expected, especially if we do not advertise it, would not hurt anybody, no? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html