Re: [PATCH 1/3] http: authenticate on NTLM proxies and others suppported, by CuRL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nelson Benitez Leon <nelsonjesus.benitez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> -	if (curl_http_proxy)
> +	if (curl_http_proxy) {
>  		curl_easy_setopt(result, CURLOPT_PROXY, curl_http_proxy);
> +		curl_easy_setopt(result, CURLOPT_PROXYAUTH, CURLAUTH_ANY);
> +	}

There was another attempt at doing the same very recently:

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/191140

I could swear there was a second one, but apparently that was you.
Neither you nor Marco submitter have so far answered the question I
raised in

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/191155

which can be summarized as: please make a case -- and put it in the
message! -- for or against making this configurable.  Is there a speed
tradeoff?  (However, you could steal some of Daniel Stenberg's
reasoning!)

Note that Marco (the submitter in the first one) has told me privately
that he could not pursue this further right now, so I suppose he'd be
happy if you could finish it.

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]