On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:33:04PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:13:16PM +0100, Clemens Buchacher wrote: > > > > Yes, that was certainly part of my pros-and-cons analysis. If you run > > > "git fsck" without "--no-dangling" without reading the manual, you may > > > get confused, but that is *not* the primary audience. > > > > It is not my only concern that users might be confused. I believe the > > command prints a lot of useless messages, which is by itself a UI > > deficiency. But even worse, those numerous messages tend to hide an > > actual problem in a long scrollback buffer. Sometimes my scrollback > > buffer is not even large enough and I have to re-run fsck (which is not > > exactly a fast command), just so I can grep out the dangling blobs. > > Yeah, but doesn't adding "--no-dangling" solve that issue? I can just as well use grep -v ^dangling. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html