Re: Adding a new file as if it had existed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Bahadir Balban wrote:

> On 12/12/06, Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > No.
> > 
> > I do not understand why not adding all the files you care about
> > eventually anyway in the initial commit is needed for
> > "performance reasons", if you do not touch majority of them for
> > a long time.  Care to explain?
> 
> If I don't know which files I may be touching in the future for
> implementing some feature,

When I use an SCM, it is to track the revisions of a project. It seems you 
are content to have only parts of a revision? That does not make sense to 
me.

> I said "performance reasons" assuming all the file hashes need checked 
> for every commit -a to see if they're changed, but I just tried on a 
> PIII and it seems not so slow.

Bingo!

You just felt the consequences of the "index".

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]