Re: Working with remotes with (too) many branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Philip,

Philip Jägenstedt wrote:

> It seems to me that if one starts out with all branches and then
> "set-branches main footopic", one really does want all other refs to
> go away on the next fetch.

I would expect set-branches to remove the remote-tracking branches
that are no longer relevant itself, actually.

Martin, does this seem sensible to you?  If so, I'll be happy to look
into it in the next few days (or I'll be even happier someone else
gets to it first).

Hope that helps,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]