On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Sean wrote: > > Technically it is workable.. but why even start down the road of having > anything but branch names after a "branch."? There has to be a better > spot for this variable, and it makes it more future proof, as you > highlighted. I do agree with Sean, both for the stability reason, but perhaps even more because I personally think it would just be better to have a separate "[color]" subsection. In fact, I'd almost prefer to see [color] diff = auto over [diff] color = auto exactly because once we have different things that take colorization arguments, it's just nicer to have them all together (and we already have "status", and now we're getting "branch" too. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html