Re: [PATCH] remote: align set-branches builtin usage and documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:17, Philip Jägenstedt
<philip.jagenstedt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The order of [--add] <name> <branch>... was inconsistent
> between builtin remote usage messages and git-remote.txt.

To clarify, it's the order of "git remote set-branches" that is
inconsistent with the two instances the patch touches:

usage: git remote set-branches <name> <branch>...
   or: git remote set-branches --add <name> <branch>...

-- 
Philip Jägenstedt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]