Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] test: tests for the "double > from mailmap" bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now I have offered some suggestions for improving some of your
> patches.  Applying these suggestions would be effortless, since I sent
> them in patch form.  What is your response?  You send a point-by-point
> rebuttal explaining how each detail of my suggestions is bad, bad,
> bad, and then resend the original with comparatively small changes.

That's a difference of opinion. And I didn't say the where 'bad'; I
just didn't agree with them.

> Can you see how this might indicate a stronger difference of opinion
> than you have mentioned?  And how a reviewer might make the mistake of
> thinking his comments were unwelcome after such an experience?

Your comments are welcome. My comments back are not?

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]