Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] refs: add common refname_match_patterns()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/11/2012 08:17 PM, Tom Grennan wrote:
> Yes, I didn't explicitly state that the precedence is the order written
> and in correctly described the first case. How about?
> 
> /**
>  * Returns in highest to lowest precedence:
>  *   1 with an empty patterns list
>  *   0 if refname fnmatch()es any ^ prefaced pattern
>  *   1 if refname fnmatch()es any other pattern
>  *   0 otherwise
>  */

Much better; thanks.

Please note that this choice of semantics limits its power.  For
example, if the rule were instead (like with gitattributes(5)) "if more
than one pattern matches a refname, a later pattern overrides an earlier
pattern", then one could do things like

    refs/remotes/*/* !refs/remotes/gitster/* refs/remotes/gitster/master

to include specific references within a hierarchy that is otherwise
excluded.

However, since rev-list apparently uses a rule more like the one that
you are proposing, it might be better to be consistent than to choose a
different convention.

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]