Re: [PATCH] strbuf: move strbuf_readline_fd() from bundle.c to strbuf.{c,h}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



徐迪 <xudifsd@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Shouldn't I supposed to receive any information about this patch?

Not necessarily X-<.

Things can get lost in the noise, and sending a reminder message like you
just did, after waiting for a few to several days, is considered a good
practice.

> Has it accepted or not?

Anything and everything being considered for inclusion is reachable from
the tip of the 'next' branch; other patches that might turn out to be of
value, or ones that at least deserve more sets of eyeballs, are only in
the 'pu' branch.

> If not what wrong with this patch?

That is not a valid question to ask.

We do not apply a patch merely because it is _not wrong_.  It must be
clear why it is a good thing for the project to apply the patch.

Your patch in question is barely a day old and I didn't have a chance to
look at it, and I do not think other volunteer reviewers did, either, so
I don't know if it is wrong or it has merit yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]