Alan Chandler wrote:
On Sunday 10 December 2006 00:11, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
Alan Chandler <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
How about the following wording here
Instead of staging the content of each file immediately after
changing it, you can wait until you have completed all the changes
you want to make and then use the `-a` option to tell `git commit`
to look for all changes to the content it is tracking and commit it
automatically. That
^^^^^^^
files
(or "files whose contents")
is, this example ...
[Yes, git tracks the contents of files, but it also has a list of
files whose contents it is tracking]
regardless, I think "it" should become "them"
... it is tracking and commit them automatically.
Works wonderfully, as the syntactically anal will notice that "them"
refers to "the changes" while newbies glossing over the docs will think
of "them" as "the files" (which is technically incorrect but amounts to
the same thing from that same newbies perspective).
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html