Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The proposal, amended to use "^" instead of "!", is that
>
> git for-each-ref A B ^C
>
> should mean "the reference names A and B but not C". Therefore, the command
>
> git rev-list $(git for-each-ref A B ^C)
>
> , which consistency suggests should do the same thing as the first
> command,...
That is an utter rubbish that does not even deserve a response.
Your argument is like saying
git for-each-ref A
and
git for-each-ref $(git rev-parse A)
should somehow magically produce the same (or related) result. The
for-each-ref command operates on refname patterns, while rev-list and
rev-parse takes object names.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html