Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> "the successor of <commit>", OTOH, is not well defined, since there can >> be several successors, and one can't order them reliably (you can't >> really know the set of successors, because they can exist in different >> repositories). > > Yet it would be nice to have a concise notation for "the nth successor > of <commit> towards <commit>" (using --first-parent ordering when > ambiguous). I thought that 47 different people can build on Linux v3.2 and when you ask the children of v3.2^0, you would not know which ones to show in what order, let alone "concise notation to pick one at random among them". Did you mean --first-child? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html