Hi Josh, On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 17:00, Joshua Redstone <joshua.redstone@xxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the comments. I've included a bunch more info on the test repo > below. It is based on a growth model of two of our current repositories > (I.e., it's not a perforce import). We already have some of the easily > separable projects in separate repositories, like HPHP. If we could > split our largest repos into multiple ones, that would help the scaling > issue. However, the code in those repos is rather interdependent and we > believe it'd hurt more than help to split it up, at least for the > medium-term future. We derive a fair amount of benefit from the code > sharing and keeping things together in a single repo, so it's not clear > when it'd make sense to get more aggressive splitting things up. > > Some more information on the test repository: The working directory is > 9.5 GB, the median file size is 2 KB. The average depth of a directory > (counting the number of '/'s) is 3.6 levels and the average depth of a > file is 4.6. More detailed histograms of the repository composition is > below: Do you have a histogram of the types of files in the repo? And as suggested earlier, is svn working for you now because it allows sparse checkout? I imagine the stats for svn on the full repo would be comparable or worse to what you measured with git? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html