Jeff King wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:22:58PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> I admit part of the reason I care is that just putting "" first would >> probably taken care of the more important part of >> <http://bugs.debian.org/399041>. > > Would that fix it? If I understand it, the repo in question is bare with > a ".git" directory inside it. The layout was foo/.git/.git. The real repository was made with plain "git init" or "git clone", and then "git svn init" or similar was run from within .git, creating a .git subdirectory. (Something more must have happened, actually, since the tree was weirdly sparse: $ find .git/.git .git/.git .git/.git/svn .git/.git/svn/git-svn .git/.git/svn/git-svn/.rev_db ) In the current scheme, to access such a broken repository remotely, you have to use a URL ".../foo". URLs pointing to foo/.git (like gitk once used) end up rewritten as .git/.git. Of course, your patch with the is_git_directory() will fix this specific case. :) Not a huge deal, especially since "git svn init" prints out where it is writing these days. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html