Am 24.01.2012 22:24, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@xxxxxx> writes: > >> The reason for this bug seems to be that in module_clonse() the name is >> not properly initialized for added submodules (it gets set to the path >> later), so the correct amount of leading "../"s for the git directory >> is not computed properly. The attached diff fixes that for me, I will >> send a patch as soon as I have extended a test case for this breakage. >> >> diff --git a/git-submodule.sh b/git-submodule.sh >> index 3adab93..9bb2e13 100755 >> --- a/git-submodule.sh >> +++ b/git-submodule.sh >> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ module_clone() >> gitdir= >> gitdir_base= >> name=$(module_name "$path" 2>/dev/null) >> + test -n "$name" || name="$path" > > This somehow smells like sweeping a problem under the rug. Why doesn't > module_name find the already registered path in the first place? > > I see "module_name" calls "git config -f .gitmodules" and I do not see any > cd_to_toplevel in git-submodule.sh that would ensure this call to access > the gitmodules file at the top-level of the superproject. Is that the real > reason why it is not finding what it should be finding? Nope, it's the fact that the .gitmodules file doesn't contain this name because the branch was rewound. Please see my post where I proposed the same change for a slightly different problem: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/187823 (just fast forward to the first hunk of my diff at the end) I just didn't realize back then that this is needed even without the other changes to work properly. The possibly missing cd_to_toplevel is another problem, the OP started the submodule add in the top level directory anyways. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html