Re: [PATCH] mergetool: Provide an empty file when no base exists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> David Aguilar <davvid@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> +    if base_present; then
>> +     checkout_staged_file 1 "$MERGED" "$BASE"
>> +    else
>> +     :>"$BASE"
>
> Just a style, but please write this as either one of the following:
>
>        >"$BASE"
>        : >"$BASE"
>
> I tend to prefer the former, but if you have to write a command, we want
> to see a SP before the redirection (and no SP before the redirect target).
>
>> +    fi
>>      local_present  && checkout_staged_file 2 "$MERGED" "$LOCAL"
>>      remote_present && checkout_staged_file 3 "$MERGED" "$REMOTE"
>
> Sorry to be ping-pong-ing like this, but wouldn't we have a similar issue
> when LOCAL or REMOTE does not exist (e.g. "they modified, we removed")?

Yes.  I'll have a [PATCH v3] soon.
-- 
            David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]