Re: [PATCH 2/8] revert: decouple sequencer actions from builtin commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

> More than the pain of rebasing the patch everytime, I guess what I'm
> asking is: is it worth stretching my foresight like this?  Once the
> code is in sequencer.c, it just becomes so much easier for me to write
> scratch code to help me wrap my head around the generalization.

In that case, why not just a patch to move the code to sequencer.c,
with whatever is the minimum of related fixes (just namespace stuff,
I'd imagine) before it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]