Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] clone: print advice on checking out detached HEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> 2012/1/10 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> This patch makes 100% sense _if_ we let clone result in a repository with
>>> a detached HEAD, which I am not sure if it is a good idea, or if it is
>>> better to fail the attempt to clone to give incentive to the owner of the
>>> remote repository to fix it.
>>
>> Then a hostile remote can stop users from cloning his repository by
>> detaching HEAD? That's not nice.
>
> That's crazy talk. Why does anybody from a hostile remote to begin with?

The point is, why punish client for remote's problems? If I have to
talk to upstream and wait for them to fix their repository, I might as
well give up cloning and move on. It's OK to annoy users to the point
that they ask upstream for a fix, but we should not disallow clone in
that case.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]