Re: [PATCH 2/6] revert: decouple sequencer actions from builtin commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>>> Jonathan Nieder wrote:

>>>> So what change does the patch actually make?  Is this a renaming?
>>>
>>> Yes, it renames "action" to "command" where appropriate.
>>
>> Wouldn't a simple renaming have a diffstat with the same number of added
>> and removed lines?
>
> Yes, almost.  A few extra lines added because I needed a new data enum
> for the "command"; also added a convenience function: action_name().

It's not a simple renaming, then.

What user-visible effect will this have, if any?  What programmer-visible
effect will it have, if any?  I _really_ should not have to read the patch
to learn the impact of a patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]