Re: [PATCH 0/3] Eliminate one user of extra_refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 03:12:30PM +0100, mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Receive pack currently uses "extra refs" to keep track of ".have"
> references, which in turn are used to tell the source the SHA1s of
> references that are already known to the repository via alternates.
> 
> But the code already creates an array holding the alternate SHA1s.  So
> just read the SHA1s out of this array rather then round-tripping them
> through the extra_refs mechanism.
> 
> This is one step towards hopefully abolishing extra_refs altogether.
> I still have to examine the other user.

Thanks, this is a nice simplification. The patches look good to me, and
they produce the same output for a simple test (I happened to be fiddling
with receive-pack and alternates yesterday, so I had a nice test case
right at hand :) ).

>   receive-pack: move more work into write_head_info()

BTW, I have a patch to make sending ".have" refs configurable[1] (it
adds a receive.advertiseAlternates config variable), which this patch
conflicts with. I don't think that is your problem, but I thought I
would mention it since you are working in the area. Is that something we
want in git?

-Peff

[1] We are using it at GitHub because our alternates repos are so huge
    that the overhead of advertising the refs outweighs the minor
    benefits you get from avoiding object transfer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]