Hey all,
Avery Pennarun has suckered me into^W^W^Wasked me to submit his
git-subtree tool for inclusion into mainline. Apparently there was some
discussion about this at GitTogether.
I have a patch ready. It takes git-subtree from the current GitHub
master, fixes the tests to use the standard git test harness and updates
the build to recognize git-subtree.
How does the git community want the patch presented? Right now it's one
monolithic thing. I understand that isn't ideal but I don't think
incorporating the entire GitHub master history is necessarily the best
idea either.
So I'm looking for some guidance.
Thanks!
-Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html