That would be great. If you need me to help test, let me know. Unfortunately I don't know Python and I know very little about the internals of git, so I can't help much more than that... Mike On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Luke Diamand <luke@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 16/12/11 16:07, Michael Horowitz wrote: >> >> For those of you using git-p4 because of a company requirement to use >> Perforce, but really wish you could use git only, the most frustrating >> part is the fact that when changes are submitted, the commit message >> is rewritten to include a reference to the P4 change number which is >> used by the sync. When syncing back changes, this causes the commit >> hash to be different, and so blows away your old commit and any parent >> commit references and such. >> >> I read someplace, I can't remember where at this point, that if git-p4 >> used notes to write the P4 change information, that would not impact >> the commit hash, so when merging back, things would not be >> overwritten, and you can maintain branches and commit history properly >> in git. >> >> I just ran into this project, where it seems that someone has >> re-written git-p4 to use notes: https://github.com/ermshiperete/git-p4 >> >> I was wondering if any of the maintainers of git-p4 has considered >> this, and might want to leverage this work to merge into the main git >> repo, possibly with an option to choose between the two behaviors. > > > I'm not sure I qualify for such a grand title as maintainer, but I was going > to give this a go in the new year as it would be quite useful, unless > someone beat me to it. I want to fix some problems with labels first though. > > Regards! > Luke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html