tr/pty-all (Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2011, #04; Tue, 13))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:

> * tr/pty-all (2011-12-12) 3 commits
>  - t/lib-terminal: test test-terminal's sanity
>  - test-terminal: set output terminals to raw mode
>  - test-terminal: give the child an empty stdin TTY
>
> Will merge to 'next' after taking another look.

The middle commit looks good.  The bottom commit could be improved as
discussed at [1], but I guess that can happen in-tree.

However, the top commit ("test test-terminal's sanity") still does not
seem right to me.

It makes the same test run three times.  Probably I should send an
alternate patch to get that sanity-check to run once, but I am also
not convinced the sanity-check is needed at all --- wouldn't any test
that is relying on output from test_terminal act as a sanity check for
it already?

As an aside, I also still believe that running "git shortlog" without
explicitly passing "HEAD" when testing how it reacts to [core] pager
configuration was a bug and a distraction, hence the patch at [2].  Am
I the only one?  I also find Jeff's patch [3] appealing.

Thanks,
Jonathan

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/186923/focus=186944
[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/186932
[3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/186936
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]