Re: Debugging git-commit slowness on a large repo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry for the poor formatting of the stack trace.

I've written two scripts to reproduce the slow commit behavior that I see.
 I've posted both to:
   https://gist.github.com/1469760

To repro, first create a dir with lots of files (it defaults to creating 1
million files in 1000 dirs):

$ loadGen.py --baseDir=./bigdir

then, run the simulator scripts to generate and commit a series of small
changes to the repo:

$ git reset --hard HEAD && simulate.py ./bigdir git

The git reset is to clean up any cruft left over from a previous partial
invocation of simulate.py

Note that loadGen.py defaults to creating 1 million files and committing
them in one commit.  With a flash drive this took < 30 min, and subsequent
small commits in simulate.py took about 6 seconds.  With a hard-drive,
it's taking > 1hr (still waiting for it to finish).

Cheers,
Josh


On 12/8/11 4:17 PM, "Joshua Redstone" <joshua.redstone@xxxxxx> wrote:

>Btw, I also tried doing some very poor-man's profiling on "git commit"
>without any of the readtree/writetree/updateindex commands.
>
>Around 50% of the time was in (bottom few frames may have varied)
>
>#1  0x00000000004c467e in find_pack_entry (sha1=0x1475a44 ,
>e=0x7fff2621f070) at sha1_file.c:2027
>#2  0x00000000004c57b0 in has_sha1_file (sha1=0x7fe2cd9c7900 "00") at
>sha1_file.c:2567  
>                  
>                 
>#3  0x000000000046e4af in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:333        
>                  
>                  
>            
>#4  0x000000000046e278 in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:285        
>                  
>                  
>            
>#5  0x000000000046e278 in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:285        
>                  
>                  
>            
>#6  0x000000000046e278 in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:285        
>                  
>                  
>            
>#7  0x000000000046e278 in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:285        
>                  
>                  
>            
>#8  0x000000000046e278 in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:285        
>                  
>                  
>            
>#9  0x000000000046e869 in cache_tree_update (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=dwarf2_read_address: Corrupted DWARF
>expression.       
>                 
>) at cache-tree.c:379
>                  
>                  
>            
>#10 0x000000000041cade in prepare_to_commit (index_file=0x781740
>".git/index", prefix=<value optimized out>, current_head=<value optimized
>out>, s=0x7fff26220d00, author_ident=<value optimized out>) at
>builtin/commit.c:866
>#11 0x000000000041d891 in cmd_commit (argc=0, argv=0x7fff262213a0,
>prefix=0x0) at builtin/commit.c:1407
>                  
>                  
>#12 0x0000000000404bf7 in handle_internal_command (argc=4,
>argv=0x7fff262213a0) at git.c:308
>                  
>                  
>#13 0x0000000000404e2f in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fff262213a0) at git.c:512
>                  
>                  
>            
> 
>
>
>And 30% of the time was in:
>
>#0  0x00000034af2c34a5 in _lxstat () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>                  
>                  
>            
>#1  0x00000000004abe0f in refresh_cache_ent (istate=0x780940,
>ce=0x7f8462a34e40, options=0, err=0x7fff6dd9f588) at
>/usr/include/sys/stat.h:443
>                  
>#2  0x00000000004ac1a0 in refresh_index (istate=0x780940, flags=<value
>optimized out>, pathspec=<value optimized out>, seen=<value optimized
>out>, header_msg=0x0) at read-cache.c:1133
>                  
>#3  0x000000000041b60a in refresh_cache_or_die (refresh_flags=<value
>optimized out>) at builtin/commit.c:331
>                  
>                  
>#4  0x000000000041bc39 in prepare_index (argc=0, argv=0x7fff6dda0310,
>prefix=0x0, current_head=<value optimized out>, is_status=<value optimized
>out>) at builtin/commit.c:414
>                 
>#5  0x000000000041d878 in cmd_commit (argc=0, argv=0x7fff6dda0310,
>prefix=0x0) at builtin/commit.c:1403
>                  
>                  
>  
>
>
>Josh
>
>
>On 12/8/11 4:09 PM, "Joshua Redstone" <joshua.redstone@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>On 12/7/11 5:39 PM, "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Joshua Redstone <joshua.redstone@xxxxxx>
>>>wrote:
>>>> Hi Duy,
>>>> Thanks for the documentation link.
>>>>
>>>> git ls-files shows 100k files, which matches # of files in the working
>>>> tree ('find . -type f -print | wc -l').
>>>
>>>Any chance you can split it into smaller repositories, or remove files
>>>from working directory (e.g. if you store logs, you don't have to keep
>>>logs from all time in working directory, they can be retrieved from
>>>history).
>>
>>It's not really feasible to split it into smaller repositories.  In fact,
>>we're expecting it to grow between 3x and 5x in number of files and
>>number
>>of commits.
>>
>>>
>>>> I added a 'git read-tree HEAD' before the git-add, and a 'git
>>>>write-tree'
>>>> after the add.  With that, the commit time slowed down to 8 seconds
>>>>per
>>>> commit, plus 4 more seconds for the read-tree/add/write-tree ops.  The
>>>> read-tree/add/write-tree each took about a second.
>>>
>>>read-tree destroys stat info in index, refreshing 100k entries in
>>>index in this case may take some time. Try this to see if commit time
>>>reduces and how much time update-index takes
>>>
>>>read-tree HEAD
>>>update-index --refresh
>>>add ....
>>>write-tree
>>>commit -q
>>
>>I added the "update-index --refresh" and the time for commit became more
>>like 0.6 seconds.
>>In this setup: read-tree takes ~2 seconds, update-index takes ~8 seconds,
>>git-add takes 1 to 4 seconds, and write-tree takes less than 1 second.
>>
>>>
>>>> As an experiment, I also tried removing the 'git read-tree' and just
>>>> having the git-write-tree.  That sped up commits to 0.6 seconds, but
>>>>the
>>>> overall time for add/write-tree/commit was still 3 to 6 seconds.
>>>
>>>overall time is not really important because we duplicate work here
>>>(write-tree is done as part of commit again). What I'm trying to do is
>>>to determine how much time each operation in commit may take.
>>>-- 
>>>Duy
>>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]